Appendix BAskingCities Action Catalog by Strategies
Below, we present a set of actions to be applied following the different strategies of AskingCities. It is a merely indicative list, to which other actions can be added depending on the local context of each AskingCity.
Create Simplicity (SIM)
| Action | Purpose | Role involved | Tools Needed | Estimated time frame |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Identify a clear and limited need | Reduce initial complexity and make action easier | Analysis and synthesis | Short interviews, collaborative notes | 1–2 weeks |
| Formulate a simple "AskingCities question" | Translating the need into an actionable question | Analysis and synthesis, dynamization | Shared document, breakout session | 1 week |
| Design a minimum viable action | Enabling action without relying on large resources | Coordination, facilitation | Simple canvas, whiteboard | 1 week |
Building interdisciplinary teams with key people (TMCs)
| Action | Purpose | Role involved | Tools Needed | Estimated time frame |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Identify key roles to fill | Avoid individual dependencies | Coordination | Role Table | 1 week |
| Create a minimal interdisciplinary team | Guaranteeing functional diversity | Coordination, institutional liaison | Kick-off meetings | 2 weeks |
| Consolidating standards and ways of working | Sustaining the team over time | Facilitation | Basic agreements | 1 week |
Understanding the Givers Network and Its Motivations (GVR)
| Action | Purpose | Role involved | Tools Needed | Estimated time frame |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Map Available Capabilities | Visualizing resources beyond money | Analysis and synthesis | Spreadsheet, wall | 1–2 weeks |
| Connecting capabilities with needs | Activate existing resources | Coordination | Crossover meetings | 1 week |
| Update the map periodically | Keeping it alive and useful | Evaluation and sustainability | Quarterly Review | Appellant |
Construct Persuasive Arguments for Givers (PCH)
| Action | Purpose | Role involved | Tools Needed | Estimated time frame |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Identify potential Givers | Broaden the base of people involved | Community dynamization | Social mapping, interviews | 2 weeks |
| One-on-one conversations with Givers | Aligning motivations and capabilities | Dynamization, coordination | Informal meetings | 1–2 weeks |
| Invite a specific contribution | Enable frictionless engagement | Coordination | Clear and limited proposal | 1 week |
Develop Good Impact Stories (STYs)
| Action | Purpose | Role involved | Tools Needed | Estimated time frame |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Execute a low-cost, high-value action | Generate visible results quickly | Core Team | Local Resources, Informal Support | 2–4 weeks |
| Document the process and the result | Capturing learning and evidence | Communication and storytelling | Photos, notes, documents | Parallel |
| Build a short story of impact | Make the achievement understandable and shareable | Communication and storytelling | Short text, presentation, web | 1 week |
Leverage the Institutional Supply Chain (SUP)
| Action | Purpose | Role involved | Tools Needed | Estimated time frame |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Identify aligned institutions | Finding a strategic fit | Institutional liaison | Map of actors | 2–4 weeks |
| Translate AskingCities to institutional language | Facilitate their adoption | Institutional liaison, storytelling | Framework document | 2 weeks |
| Integrating AskingCities into the value chain | Ensuring sustainability | Coordination, evaluation | Conventions, agreements |
Develop a Replicable Roadmap (RMP)
| Action | Purpose | Role involved | Tools Needed | Estimated time frame |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Identify milestones and phases | Give a sense of progression | Analysis, coordination | Timeline | 1–2 weeks |
| Document decisions and learnings | Facilitate future replication | Analysis and synthesis | Shared documentation | Continuous |
| Validate the roadmap with the team | Ensuring collective ownership | Facilitation | Review workshop | 1 week |